Strict Scrutiny
by Crooked Media
Latest Business Ideas
Legal History Podcast Series
Market Gap: The public lacks accessible discussions about U.S. legal history.
Develop a podcast series that focuses on pivotal moments in U.S. legal history, particularly around the Reconstruction era and the 14th Amendment. Each episode could explore specific cases, historical figures, and their relevance to contemporary issues, making legal history accessible and engaging for a broad audience. By featuring expert guests, historians, and legal practitioners, the podcast could illuminate the ongoing impact of these legal developments. This series could help foster greater public interest in legal history and its implications for current civil rights discussions, ultimately motivating listeners to become active participants in advocating for justice.
From: The Trump Administration's SCOTUS Winning Streak
14th Amendment Advocacy Campaign
Market Gap: Lack of political engagement on constitutional issues.
Launch an advocacy campaign focused on raising awareness about the 14th Amendment and its relevance in today's society. The campaign could include community forums, social media outreach, and partnerships with civic organizations to encourage discussions about constitutional rights and values. By mobilizing citizens to engage with the 14th Amendment, we can create a groundswell of support for protecting civil rights and fostering a deeper understanding of the importance of constitutional protections. This campaign could also encourage individuals to communicate their constitutional vision to elected officials, holding them accountable for their stances on civil rights.
From: The Trump Administration's SCOTUS Winning Streak
14th Amendment Educational Platform
Market Gap: Many people lack awareness of the 14th Amendment's significance.
Create an educational platform focused on the 14th Amendment and its historical significance, targeting law students, educators, and the general public. This platform could feature online courses, webinars, interactive materials, and resources that delve into the history of the Reconstruction era, the drafting of the 14th Amendment, and its implications for civil rights today. By fostering knowledge about this pivotal constitutional amendment, the platform could empower individuals to understand their rights and advocate for justice in contemporary society. Collaborations with law schools and civil rights organizations could enhance outreach and effectiveness.
From: The Trump Administration's SCOTUS Winning Streak
Civic Education and Advocacy Platform
Market Gap: Civic engagement in legal processes is often minimal.
A Civic Education and Advocacy Platform would empower citizens by providing them with the resources they need to understand legal processes and engage in advocacy effectively. This platform could offer educational materials, webinars, and interactive tools that explain the workings of the judicial system, the significance of legal decisions, and how citizens can advocate for their rights. Similar to Justice Jackson's emphasis on the importance of public understanding and engagement in legal issues, this platform would prioritize making legal knowledge accessible and actionable. By encouraging civic participation and advocacy, it would foster a more informed and engaged citizenry that is capable of holding the legal system accountable.
From: Looking for Bright Spots in the Courts
Legal Analysis Platform for Public Engagement
Market Gap: Public understanding of legal decisions is often lacking.
A Legal Analysis Platform for Public Engagement could serve as a bridge between the judiciary and the public. This platform would focus on providing clear, accessible explanations of legal decisions, especially those from the Supreme Court, and their broader implications on society. Similar to how Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson emphasizes the importance of understanding the legal context and the implications of judicial decisions, this platform would strive to educate the public about ongoing legal issues. It could feature expert commentary, interactive elements, and opportunities for public engagement and dialogue, fostering a better-informed citizenry. By prioritizing transparency and education, this platform could enhance public trust in the judicial system and encourage active participation in legal discourse.
From: Looking for Bright Spots in the Courts
Parental Rights Advocacy Network
Market Gap: Parents lack resources and support for educational battles.
An advocacy network focused on parental rights in education could provide resources, legal support, and community connections for parents seeking to influence educational policies. This organization could host workshops, provide templates for letters to schools, and create a database of legal resources. Additionally, the network could facilitate parent-led initiatives to address specific curricular concerns, empowering them to take action collectively. By building a support system, this network could help parents navigate the complexities of educational advocacy more effectively.
From: How SCOTUS is Making Project 2025 a Reality
Educational Transparency App
Market Gap: Lack of transparency in school curricula frustrates parents.
An app designed for educational transparency could allow parents to see curricula, lesson plans, and other educational materials being used in their children's schools. This app could also provide a platform for parents to ask questions and provide feedback to educators. By increasing transparency, the app would foster a more collaborative relationship between parents and schools, allowing parents to feel more engaged and informed about their children's education. It could also include features like notifications about curriculum changes or important events related to educational policies.
From: How SCOTUS is Making Project 2025 a Reality
Parental Rights Education Platform
Market Gap: Parents feel powerless over children's education content decisions.
A platform that allows parents to voice concerns and opt-out of certain educational content would serve as a bridge between parental authority and educational institutions. This service would offer tools for parents to communicate directly with schools, understand curricula, and provide feedback on content their children are exposed to. By facilitating this dialogue, the platform could help parents feel more empowered and involved in their children's education. It could also include resources about educational transparency and parental rights, along with an advisory board of educators to ensure productive conversations between parents and schools.
From: How SCOTUS is Making Project 2025 a Reality
Age Verification Technology for Online Content
Market Gap: Minors can easily access inappropriate online content without restrictions.
The Age Verification Technology for Online Content business idea proposes the development of advanced technology solutions that ensure minors cannot access inappropriate content online. This can involve creating systems that verify a user's age through secure methods, such as biometric verification or linking to government-issued identification. By implementing these systems, online platforms can better protect younger audiences from harmful material while complying with new regulations. This idea targets content providers, educational institutions, and parents seeking to safeguard children’s online experiences. The implementation would require partnerships with tech developers and a strategic marketing approach to reach content platforms needing to comply with age restriction laws.
From: How SCOTUS is Making Project 2025 a Reality
Parental Rights Advocacy and Legal Services
Market Gap: Parents feel their rights are being undermined in educational settings.
The Parental Rights Advocacy and Legal Services business concept aims to provide legal support and advocacy for parents seeking to assert their rights in educational settings. This service would help parents understand their legal position concerning school curricula, specifically regarding sex education and LGBTQ+ topics. It would offer resources for parents who want to opt their children out of certain lessons and provide legal representation for those who face challenges from educational authorities. The target audience includes parents concerned about their children's education and schools facing increasing scrutiny over inclusive policies. This initiative would capitalize on the ongoing cultural debates around parental rights and education, potentially offering workshops and legal consultations to empower parents.
From: How SCOTUS is Making Project 2025 a Reality
Recent Episodes
The Trump Administration's SCOTUS Winning Streak
Host: Leah Littman, Melissa Murray, Kate Shaw
The Shadow Docket Just Won’t Quit
Host: Kate Shaw, Melissa Murray, Leah Lippman
3 ideas found
The Dubious Legality of Trump's DC Takeover
Host: Leah Litman, Kate Shaw, Melissa Murray
How the GOP is Trying to Steal the 2026 Midterms
Host: Melissa Murray and Imani Gandy
3 ideas found
Get Business Ideas from Strict Scrutiny
Join our community to receive curated business opportunities from this and hundreds of other podcasts.